期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

Journal of Research in Primary and Secondary Education. 2022; 1: (1) ; 48-51 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.jrpe.20220012.

Content Validity Analysis of the Grammar Fill-in-the-Blank Test in the National CollegeEntrance Examination in 2021
2021年高考英语全国甲卷语法填空的内容效度分析

作者: 万永丽 *

西华师范大学 四川南充

*通讯作者: 万永丽,单位:西华师范大学 四川南充;

发布时间: 2022-06-30 总浏览量: 3616

摘要

语法填空以语篇为依托对语法项目进行考查,本文根据《普通高中英语课程标准》(2017年版2020年修订),围绕文本的题材及体裁、难度和考点效度这几个方面对2021年高考英语全国甲卷语法填空题进行内容效度分析。研究结果表明:题材选择贴切生活,客观真实,体裁为常见的记叙文;文章较容易,可读性较高;考点涵盖广,考点层次以词组和句子为主,焦点因素以语法为主,考点效度高,内容效度较高。

关键词: 高考英语;语法填空;内容效度;考点层次;焦点因素

Abstract

The grammar gap-filling test aims to test the grammar items based on the discourse. This paper focuses on the grammar gap-filling in paper A of college entrance examination English in 2021, combining the English curriculum standard for senior high schools (2017 edition, revised in 2020) and surrounding the theme and genre of the text, difficulty and examination site level to analyze the content validity of grammar gap-filling test in paper A of college entrance examination English. The research results show that: the theme selection related to daily life which is objective and true, and the genre is a common narrative; The article is comparatively easy and readable; The test center covers a wide range that the level of the test center mainly focus on phrases and sentences, and the focus factor is grammar, therefore, the test center validity and the content validity is high.

Key words: College entrance examination English; Fill in the blanks with grammar; Content validity; Examination site level, focus factor

参考文献 References

[1] 徐良、邹申.高考英语(上海卷)语法评价模式的对比分析与思考[J].外语电化教学,2013,154: 11-16.

[2] 中华人民共和国教育部.《普通高中英语课程标准》(2017年版2020年修订)[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2020.

[3] 李迪.语言测试公平性检验量表研制与效度验证[J]. 外语界,2021,1:88-95

[4] 刘建达,贺满足.语言测试效度理论的新发展[J]. 现代外语(双月刊),2020(43),4:565-575

[5] Healon.J.B. Writing English Language Test[M]. 北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2000.

[6] Alderson,J.C.,Clapham,C.&Wall,D. Language Testing Construction and Evaluation[M].Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2000.

[7] 程晓堂.基于问题情境的英语考试命题理念与技术[J]. 中国考试,2018, 12:1-8. 

[8] 张春青.高考英语语法填空题构念效度的Rasch 模型分析[J]. 现代外语,2015,2:258-268.

[9] 陈国华.中英基础教育英语课程教学目标对比研究:阅读、写作与语法知识[J]. 中国外语教育(季刊),2016(9), 4: 24-32

[10] Purpura J. Assessing Grammar [M]. Cambridge:CUP, 2004.

[11] 石俊敏.从课标和高考评价体系2020年高考英语全国I卷试题[J]. 中小学外语教学, 2020, 1:61-65.

[12] 彭莹莹.2017年高考全国卷英语听力测试语篇输入与预期回答任务特征分析[J]. 教育测量与评价, 2018,4:11-16.

[13] 李筱菊.语言测试科学与艺术[M].长沙:湖南教育出版社,1997. 

[14] 康廷虎,王旎撰,高吴平.记叙文阅读中主人公转换对情境模型更新的影响[J].心理与行为研究,2020(18),1:1-7.

[15] 郑瑶 黄锐, 2014~2019 年高考英语全国I卷语法填空题历时研究[J]. 中小学外语教学, 2019,11: 14-19.


引用本文

万永丽, 2021年高考英语全国甲卷语法填空的内容效度分析[J]. 中小学教育研究, 2022; 1: (1) : 48-51.